I did read your post carefully and now I hope you read mine carefully.
First, my background. 35 years in the insurance industry the last 9 of which were as a property claim rep. My territory included the gulf states. I was already retired when Ike struck but prior to my retirement I handled claims for the 2004 and 2005 hurricanes including Katrina. Hundreds of claims had to do with either condo association policies or unitowner policies and I often pondered weak and weary over many a quaint and curious volume of CC&Rs.
Allow me to educate you a bit on things you might not be aware of.
1 - The CC&Rs define what is a "common element" and what is a "unit." Read the CC&Rs and find those definitions. It is your legal obligation to read and understand the CC&Rs because that is your contract with the HOA and that contract is enforceable in court. Nobody is obligated to tell you what's in them.
2 - Your unitowner's policy (HO-6) covers damage to your "unit." The association property insurance covers damage to the "common elements." If you owned rental condos you would have had an individual policy covering fire, wind, hail, etc and liability. The association property insurance requirements are addressed in the CC&Rs. Since it is your obligation to read and understand the CC&Rs, the HOA has no obligation to tell you about the HOA's property insurance. It's all in there for you to read.
3 - When the hurricane hit, was your "unit" damaged and/or was there any damage to "common elements" associated with your unit? You won't be able to answer that question until you've read the CC&Rs and understand the difference between "unit" and "common elements."
4 - If your "unit" was damaged (within the definition of "unit" you would have had to file a claim with your own insurance company.
5 - If the "common elements" associated with your "unit" were damaged you would have had to report that damage to the HOA WHEN IT HAPPENED. Nobody was obligated to hunt you down and ask you if you had damage. The CC&Rs address not only the HOA insurance but also address the HOA's obligation to repair damage to "common elements." It's all in CC&Rs.
Now, let's examine your comments:
John Bahran:I said the 122 homeowners didn't file damages because they didn't know about it.
Have you questioned each and every one of those 122 homeowners to find out what they did or didn't do about their damage?
John Bahran:So yes they "probably" had damges but didn't know if it would meet the deductible
That's no excuse for not reporting "common element" damage to the HOA.
John Bahran:they "probably" had damages but didn't even know they could file becuae many are foreign-born
Also no excuse. US law charges you with knowledge or constructive knowledge of the terms and conditions of your contracts regardless of where you were born. Constructive knowledge means that you are out of luck if you didn't read it or didn't bother hunting down a copy when you bought the place.
John Bahran: just don't know that we had disaster coverage
Again, it's in the CC&Rs.
John Bahran:If we were notified there was insuarnce money coming , we could have notifed each other
Again, nobody's obligated to notify you because the insurance information is in the CC&Rs. And, frankly, anybody who made a claim under their unitowner policy would very likely been told by their own claim rep that any items of "common elements" that were claimed were not covered by their policy.
John Bahran:even read and if we didn't understand that we could have asked others to help us in undersatnding, but we were not given the chance
Again, it was entirely up to the unitowners to get themselves the CC&Rs when they bought the place and familiarize themselves with its contents.
John Bahran:In all their newsletters for the last 2 years, there was not one word about insurance settlement. Doesn't that sound odd if not downright insurance fraud , that money about 1/6 of our annual budget is being distributed, and not one word about it anywhere?
So far there is no evidence of any insurance fraud nor is there any evidence of statutory violations that you previously alluded to. "Odd" is not necessarily illegal.
John Bahran:Doesn't that sound strange that only 8 homeowners with special ties and positions got that money?
Do you really KNOW that those 8 homeowners "got" the money from the HOA insurance?
As I explained earlier, $150,000 worth of damage to "common elements" would have had to have been repaired and lot's of money paid to contractor's. It's also quite likely that the insurance company would have paid a depreciated amount to the HOA and held back the balance until the repairs were completed and then only paid the balance when presented with paid contractors' invoices. I find it difficult to imagine that there would have been money left over to make individual payments to selected homeowners.
That alone suggests that you might be jumping to conclusions based on erroneous assumptions.
I'm not saying that it didn't happen I'm just postulating why it might not have been able to happen in the way you allege and I'm suggesting that there are a lot of things you still need to find out before you have grounds for a lawsuit.