This is priceless.

Previous | Next
 rated by 0 users
Latest post 06-08-2011 8:56 PM by adjuster jack. 15 replies.
  • 06-07-2011 7:16 PM

    Ok [+0+] This is priceless.

    'Sweet Justice' as wronged homeowners repossess bank.

    From what I have read, this would be a once in a lifetime event, but I found it very interesting (and funny). Seems even banks can mess up too. Ok

    I do have a question: How on earth could the bank attempt to foreclose on someone who paid cash out on their property?

    "Never assume anything and always verify everything." ~ Taxagent

  • 06-07-2011 7:30 PM In reply to

    Re: This is priceless.

    Miss Magoo:

    From what I have read, this would be a once in a lifetime event, but I found it very interesting (and funny). Seems even banks can mess up too.

    Oh, Magoo, you've done it again.

    (Been wanting to say that for months.)Ok

    Miss Magoo:
    How on earth could the bank attempt to foreclose on someone who paid cash out on their property?

    Easy. Banks are monumental bureaucracies that are segmented into hundreds of departments where millions of items of communications flow between the departments. Not hard to imagine a colossal screwup that caused the foreclosure followed by a colossal screwup that resulted in ignoring the judgment.

    However, when somebody overdraws their account or bounces a check because "the bank made a mistake", I don't buy it.

    • The right of the people 
    • to keep and bear arms,
    • shall not be infringed.
  • 06-07-2011 7:30 PM In reply to

    Re: This is priceless.

    Apparently, it was an REO property and the Nyerges purchased it from BOA.  

    The only thing that I have read explaining the foreclosure screwup is:

     

    "During his research, Nyerges heard that his name got transposed from purchase agreements onto the prior foreclosure.
     
    "I don't know if that is a fact, because no one really had the facts," he said."

     

  • 06-07-2011 7:44 PM In reply to

    Re: This is priceless.

    Saw that one yesterday.  They actually came in the with sheriff and trucks to take away desks, chairs, money in cash drawers, etc!

     

  • 06-07-2011 7:45 PM In reply to

    Re: This is priceless.

    adjuster jack:

    Oh, Magoo, you've done it again.

    (Been wanting to say that for months.)

    I like the sound, definitely well worth waiting months to hear!! Ok

    adjuster jack:
    Easy. Banks are monumental bureaucracies that are segmented into hundreds of departments where millions of items of communications flow between the departments. Not hard to imagine a colossal screwup that caused the foreclosure followed by a colossal screwup that resulted in ignoring the judgment.

    Wow! Hearing it put that way, I am actually quite surprised it doesn't happen more often then...

    Maybe its because the banks wouldn't like to be always trying to save face... Ok

     

    harrylime:

    Apparently, it was an REO property and the Nyerges purchased it from BOA.  

    The only thing that I have read explaining the foreclosure screwup is:

     

    "During his research, Nyerges heard that his name got transposed from purchase agreements onto the prior foreclosure.
     
    "I don't know if that is a fact, because no one really had the facts," he said."

    What does BOA stand for?

    This seems to be one of those classic comical messups of the century. :) But boy am I glad I am not the one responsible for it! Ok

     

    "Never assume anything and always verify everything." ~ Taxagent

  • 06-07-2011 7:47 PM In reply to

    Re: This is priceless.

    superman1:
    Saw that one yesterday.  They actually came in the with sheriff and trucks to take away desks, chairs, money in cash drawers, etc!

    That made me laugh so hard! Just the thought of someone backing up a moving van, walking into the bank and hauling out the furniture!!! Plus empytying out the teller drawers too!! Ok I can't help but wonder if the lawyer got a kick out of it... Ok

    "Never assume anything and always verify everything." ~ Taxagent

  • 06-07-2011 7:51 PM In reply to

    Re: This is priceless.

    Miss Magoo:
    What does BOA stand for?

    Bank of America.

  • 06-07-2011 7:53 PM In reply to

    Re: This is priceless.

    harrylime:
    Bank of America.

    Duh...I cannot believe I didn't figure that one out...

    Thanks harrylime! Ok

    "Never assume anything and always verify everything." ~ Taxagent

  • 06-07-2011 8:02 PM In reply to

    Re: This is priceless.

    >I can't help but wonder if the lawyer got a kick out of it...

    He did, there was a video

    http://link.brightcove.com/services/player/bcpid34830125001?bckey=AQ~~,AAAAB_xxr4E~,KlXoaM3qDg45myEW5EEZs3qW_eVNLS6g&bctid=975232488001

     

  • 06-07-2011 8:12 PM In reply to

    Re: This is priceless.

    Miss Magoo:

    adjuster jack:

    Oh, Magoo, you've done it again.

    (Been wanting to say that for months.)

    I like the sound, definitely well worth waiting months to hear!!

    Watch this:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ui4RJ3Fqy9w

    • The right of the people 
    • to keep and bear arms,
    • shall not be infringed.
  • 06-07-2011 8:45 PM In reply to

    Re: This is priceless.

    It made the news here in Atlanta too.  Apparently the bank manager was sweating bullets attempting to work it out until they cut the guy a check.  The levels of incompetence it rose to for this to family to have to resort to these tactics to collect on legal fees they were rightfully owed is ridiculous.  It is no wonder I no longer bank with these clowns.  

    "That's just my opinion, then again I might be wrong."  Dennis Miller

     

  • 06-07-2011 9:55 PM In reply to

    Re: This is priceless.

    Miss Magoo:

    adjuster jack:
    Easy. Banks are monumental bureaucracies that are segmented into hundreds of departments where millions of items of communications flow between the departments. Not hard to imagine a colossal screwup that caused the foreclosure followed by a colossal screwup that resulted in ignoring the judgment.

    Wow! Hearing it put that way, I am actually quite surprised it doesn't happen more often then...

    Jack makes it sound more chaotic at banks than it really is. However, in any organization, things can get overlooked or screwed, more so in bigger organizations in which functions are much more divided and policies more regimented. Still, most banks, and especially the big ones, didn't get where they are by being incompetent and letting all sorts of things get out of control. They do have good control systems and don't miss all that much.

    Mistakes happen, though, and folks who pay attention to details can profit from them. Some years ago, when I was with the IRS, I once had to collect over $100k in income tax owed by a couple who owned two homes in the same county. One was their residence, the other a rental. The same big bank granted the mortgages on both properties. I pulled the mortgage documents for both from the deed records office. While the address shown on each mortgage was correct, I realized that both mortgages had the exact same property description. Whoever prepared the mortgage document was using the wrong deed to get the the property description from. The effect under that state's case law was that the bank had two mortgages on the residence for far more than that one was worth, and the rental was unencumbered.

    I threatened to seize and sell the rental to get the taxes paid. The bank's lawyers insisted that the address was enough to encumber the property. I pointed out the case law against the bank and asked if the bank was willing to litigate the point in federal court against the U.S. government. The bank blinked, loaned the couple the money to pay the tax lien, and then refinanced both properties in wrap around mortgages to account for all the loans made, taking extra special care the second time around to get the property descriptions correct.

    Had I not taken the time to carefully read the property descriptions and had instead relied just on the addresses shown, I'd have missed an important opportunity for the government. This reinforces was good lawyers know: never assume anything and always verify everything. As I've said on these boards often, the details really do matter.

  • 06-08-2011 5:35 PM In reply to

    Re: This is priceless.

    superman1:

    He did, there was a video

    http://link.brightcove.com/services/player/bcpid34830125001?bckey=AQ~~,AAAAB_xxr4E~,KlXoaM3qDg45myEW5EEZs3qW_eVNLS6g&bctid=975232488001

    Thanks for the link Superman, all I can say was that was classic!! Certainly not something I see or read about everyday. Ok

    adjuster jack:

    Oh my! :D I loved it!!! Only Mr. Magoo could get away with something like that!! I now have a new favorite youtube video. Ok And I like my mom given nickname/screename even more...Ok

    Taxagent:
    never assume anything and always verify everything.

    I am going to keep this in mind whenever I hear of something, all to easily I have the tendency to jump on a 'bandwagon' without hearing the whole story.

    "Never assume anything and always verify everything." ~ Taxagent

  • 06-08-2011 5:51 PM In reply to

    Re: This is priceless.

    Taxagent:
    never assume anything and always verify everything.

    And, thus, is the theme of this website, where many have found themselves in trouble because they assumed without verifying.

    We are admonished by the wisest of the wise:

    "Trust everybody, but cut the cards yourself." - W. C. Fields

    "Trust no one." - Fox Mulder

     

    • The right of the people 
    • to keep and bear arms,
    • shall not be infringed.
  • 06-08-2011 6:49 PM In reply to

    Re: This is priceless.

    adjuster jack:
    "Trust no one." - Fox Mulder

    I prefer the one by Ronald Reagan regarding arms control agreements with the then-Soviet Union: "Trust, but verify." :-)

Page 1 of 2 (16 items) 1 2 Next > | RSS

My Community

Community Membership New Users: Search Community